Skip to main content

Xavi PlaystyleXavi Hernández did not take the Netherlands job to manage a slightly tidier version of the last cycle. He wants the team to look like protagonists again: the ball on the opponent’s half, courage without the ball, and a public that recognises the side as Dutch in spirit even if the coach is Catalan. His own shorthand is blunt. Possession. Position. Pressing. Perception. Passion. Without the last one, he says, you cannot play football.

That is not a slogan pasted onto a 4-3-3. It is the game model he is trying to drill in Zeist in double sessions — noon, then half past five — because international windows are short and he does not believe habits change in a team talk. Nigel de Jong hired him for a culture shift after the round-of-32 World Cup exit and years of argument that Oranje had become a doubting counter team wearing an orange shirt. Xavi is the first foreign head coach since Ernst Happel in 1978. His tenure ended with a place in a World Cup Final. The brief is restoration, not nostalgia.

The striker he will not use as a shortcut

The cleanest signal in the first squad is who is missing. Wout Weghorst is out. So is Memphis Depay, after what Xavi called the hardest conversation of the cut. The door is not slammed forever — he said so twice — but the idea of Weghorst as the emergency plan is finished for now.

Weghorst’s value for Oranje was never subtle. He was the pinch-hitter: the wrecking ball you throw on when the pattern dies, the man who occupies centre-backs, wins the second ball, and turns a match into a fight in the box. That is a legitimate tool. It is also the opposite of how Xavi thinks football should be solved. Hans Kraaij Jr. put it without dressing: Xavi does not look like a coach who needs battering rams. Like Luis de la Fuente with Spain, he treats the old English habit — hoist it into the eighteen and let the biggest body fight — as a little ordinary. Xavi is an under-the-knee coach. Plan C, if it exists, is still meant to look like football.

That choice is not a personality clash. It is the game model. If your first idea when stuck is a long diagonal onto a target man, you stop occupying the half-spaces, stop creating the third-man run, and stop asking midfielders to play the difficult pass. You also tell the rest of the team that structure is optional once the scoreboard gets nervous. Xavi would rather live with a night of patient circulation than reset the whole attack into a dual in the air. Brian Brobbey, Donyell Malen, Cody Gakpo and the younger wide options are there to combine and press, not to wait under a high ball.

“Ok, who farted??”

 

What “dominant” actually means

Xavi’s line is that dominance is not the same as endless crossing. “We want to be the protagonists on the pitch. We want to play on the opponent’s half. We will try to have the ball and defend bravely.” Nigel De Jong has said the same from the federation side: dominant also means conceding fewer goals. Control of territory first, entertainment as a consequence.

He has already ruled out the five-at-the-back Koeman used against Morocco. “Five defenders do not fit my philosophy.” The shapes he names are 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1 or 3-4-3 — systems from which you can occupy the pitch and create overloads and triangles rather than sit in a low block and hope. Wide attackers who stretch the field, a midfielder who can receive between the lines, full-backs who are not twins: one can hold width, the other can tuck in to make a midfield three. That is positional play in the Barcelona sense he grew up with, the chain that runs Michels–Cruyff–Van Gaal–Guardiola. Xavi is not pretending he invented it. But he is insisting Oranje play it again.

Recovering possession needs to be faster than the last few tournaments allowed, is his principle. He has talked about hombre a hombre — recovering the ball high and quickly, man-oriented pressure rather than a polite mid-block. This is the PSV Peter Bosz style, or the Atalanta Gaspirini style. At Barcelona his sides limited counters because they won the ball back before the opponent could run. Training this week included cramped hexagonal rondo work, three versus eight, the kind of extreme underload that forces tight distances and one- or two-touch circulation under heat. That is not decoration. It is preparation for Jürgen Klopp’s Germany on Thursday in Amsterdam: if you cannot keep the ball when pressed, you will not get to play Xavi’s football at all.

A unique situation, Ruben van Bommel the first player whose dad and granddad made it into Oranje

Who else fits the picture

Joey Veerman is back after slipping down the order under Koeman; Xavi likes a midfielder who will play the difficult forward pass instead of skipping the midfield with a hopeful ball. Frenkie de Jong remains the theoretical hub — fundamental for the build-up — but he is injured this window, so the six position will be a live experiment. Ruben van Bommel and Gjivai Zechiël are in as young wide and midfield options. Virgil van Dijk stays captain. Four Nations League games in eleven days give Xavi room to rotate a group of 26 and see who actually runs the distances his press requires. Oranje’s lack of metres at Euro 2024 was public knowledge. Intensity is not optional in this model.

The risk he is taking

Club football gave Xavi months to install patterns. Nations League windows give him days. Spain under De la Fuente has shown a possession side can still be built in fragments, but Oranje’s recent identity was reactive: Van Gaal’s World Cup pragmatism, Koeman’s flexibility that often became a back five when the night got serious. Leaving Weghorst out is the public version of that argument. There will be a match, sooner or later, when Oranje cannot pick the lock and the stands start shouting for a battering ram. Xavi’s answer is already on record: play through it, press for it, do not hoist it and hope.

Thursday against Klopp is a brutal first exam. If Oranje spend the night on Germany’s half, with the ball, and look like they want it back the moment they lose it, the new coach will have made his point even before the result. If they drop off and wait, the job will look like the last one with a different accent. Xavi has already said he cannot promise results. He can promise a way of playing. Leaving the wrecking-ball striker at home is how he has chosen to start.

9 Comments

  • Johan says:

    Great piece, Jan. This is exactly what makes the start of the Xavi era so interesting. It’s not just about changing a few players or the formation, but about bringing back an Oranje that wants to dominate, play on the opponent’s half and immediately win the ball back. I especially like the point about not abandoning the philosophy when things get difficult. Now comes the real test: can Xavi implement all of this with so little training time? Germany should give us a fascinating first indication.

  • jean_venette says:

    My only concern is that, if Xavi thinks he can simply revive this team just by introducing new tactics, he’s making a huge mistake.
    We’ve seen these guys played under Koeman for 4 years. So many of them aren’t simply good enough.

    This nation league is a great opportunity to bring new faces into the squad and start rebuilding but he’s not doing that.

    Also, Xavi is never going to find such opportunity where you play 4 games in a row during an international break.

    Lastly 2 years from now, Van Dijk is going to be 37. His leadership role should have been reduced. Xavi gave him too much hope. The man is getting slower and slower

    Just my opinion

  • andrew says:

    That is a very good article Jan; it almost makes you feel the energy and intensity bristling off Xavi. There are four games to see which of the current group can execute his style at the level he expects. It feels like such a change from both tactics and expectations of the players, that there could be some real growing pains in this first game. I’ll be most interested in how they look by the end of these four games.

    At the same time, Klopp will be imprinting his own style. So who knows what to expect today: all adrenalin and energy or what looks like a cagey game as two teams try to figure new systems? Can’t wait.

  • andrew says:

    The lineup per VI:

    Verbruggen; Van de Ven, Van Dyke, Van Hecke, Dumfries; Q. Timber, Gravenberch, Reijnders; Gakpo, Brobbey, Summerville.

    • Forza says:

      Same lineup as Koeman’s.

      A few 1st half observations:

      Van Dijk’s goal rescinded as Brobbey was penalized for pushing the goalie according to the new rules.

      Brobbey left the game thru injury. Looked like he pulled a hamstring or calf injury with no contact. Meerdink came on but not much passes coming his way.

      Germany dominated a lot and could have easily been up 2. We closed out the 1st half with a bit more initiative but a bad showing so far.

      Xavi’s highline press doesn’t suit Van Dijk. He is losing almost all one on one foot races against speedy attackers on the counterattack.

      Open game from both sides. Lots of spaces on counters for both. But Klopp is excited jumping around as his usual animated personality

      Xavi needs to stabilize the midfield. Quentin isn’t really doing much, and Gravenberch has been quiet.

      • Forza says:

        Couldn’t watch the 2nd half, but glad we got something out of it. Could have gotten the win if the referees didnt mess it up and lots of chances missed but it is a positive result that the team showed fight. They created good opportunities and we got a beautiful goal in the end. What a pass from Van Bommel and Gakpo made sure it counted.

  • andrew says:

    That is funny JB, thanks for posting.

    Good performance. One game, but Xavi looks the part of the right man for the job. Van Bommel’s cross, superb, will be a large share of the talk (deservedly), but Gakpo’s finish, too, was of a high order.

    As far as the disallowed goals go, the first was one of the reasons I don’t like VAR for subjective decisions. You can freeze frame the exact moment of contact, but you don’t know don’t know how severe the contact was and/or how much Ter Stegen was hindered (if at all), and immediately after it looked like he was gesturing at his own defenders, not turning right to the referee as a GK would normally do if impeded. As far as the second one, lots of awkward falling and thrashing, but where was the foul?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.